Re: [DRAFT] TTWG's response to your comments about IMSC 1.0.1

Thierry,

this seems to suggest that external reviewers who are not members of W3C
have the option to raise a formal objection with the Director. Is that
true?

Kind regards,

Nigel


On 09/06/2017, 08:40, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:

>
>Pierre,
>
>Here is the boiler plate to respond to the IMSC 1.0.1 comments
>(example here for ARIB)
>Note that I propose to request for approuval before 18 June 2017.
>
>Thierry
>
>=====================================================================
>The Timed Text Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
>the Wide Review Working Draft [2] of IMSC 1.0.1 published on 22 March
>2017. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to
>send us comments.
>
>The Working Group's response to your comments is included below.
>
>Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
>public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5Bimsc%5D if you agree with it or not before
>18 June 2017. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
>specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
>If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the
>opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by
>the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in
>the W3C Recommendation Track.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>For the Timed Text Working Group,
>Thierry Michel
>W3C Staff Contact
>
>1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017May/0018.html
>2. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170322/
>
>----------------------------------------
>Working Group's response to your comments
>----------------------------------------
>
>A-  Your comment on activeArea attribute
>
>@@ WG's response to be added here @@
>
>
>B- Your comment on fillLineGap attribute
>@@ WG's response to be added here @@
>
>
>========================================================================
>

Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 08:52:38 UTC