W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > August 2012

Re: ISSUE-177: Monica: Clarify mandatory processing semantics referenced in Section 3.2.1. Consider whether to use Appendix D, Table E-2.

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:29:10 +0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+e-PU2mBmugF8EcLxkw5YrGntuAQmkyUC-im4-6cYf+sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> ISSUE-177: Monica: Clarify mandatory processing semantics referenced in
> Section 3.2.1. Consider whether to use Appendix D, Table E-2.
>
> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/177


This is a catch all (boilerplate) clause that simply means that every
statement in the specification that can be reasonably interpreted as a
normative requirement on processing semantics must be so interpreted. We
are not going to enumerate these cases. That is, enumerating would be
equivalent to specifying all assertable requirements in the spec, which is
not done in the W3C.

So I would suggest we close this issue and take no action unless someone
has a very specific proposal.
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 22:30:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 August 2012 22:30:01 GMT