W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Working Drafts

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:48:54 -0800
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2099C357-F376-4D95-ABD5-D5B9568DBD7B@gbiv.com>
To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Justin Brookman wrote:

> Following up on this email from Nick last month (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013Dec/0057.html), our process requires us to publish occasional snapshot working drafts of the specifications we are working on.  I think the TPE is currently in flux while we consider the proposed changes that Roy has put into the Editors' Draft (eliminating the dependencies between the specifications).  However, the Compliance document (http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html) can be published with the updated definitions that we have agreed upon over the past two months.  No one objected to Nick's proposal, so I'll ask him to proceed to update the status of the drafts (see Nick's email for full details).

Publication of an ED should be based on whether it is an improvement
(in terms of representing the group's current discussions) versus the
prior WD.  All WDs are "in flux", so that aspect is irrelevant.

Why don't you ask the WG if there are any objections to publishing
the current ED for both TPE (15 Jan) and TCS (16 Jan)?

My preference is for both to be published now, since they are both
better than the prior WDs.  Saying that the content is in flux is
a fine comment for the SOTD section.

....Roy
Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 19:49:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:21 UTC