W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ACTION-185: Draft specific field proposal for optional auditors

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:24:05 -0700
Cc: Kevin Trilli <ktrilli@truste.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8034DA7F-FD20-4FDF-AA5D-4CE0B99044EE@gbiv.com>
To: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
I think the last suggestion was simply "audit" and that it
consist of an array of links to the audited results (if available)
or the auditor (if not).

....Roy

On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Nicholas Doty wrote:

> Are we ready to add this to the Tracking Status Resource section?
> 
> Also, I thought the suggestion was to have "auditors" rather than "auditor" and then an array of strings of URIs.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
> On May 24, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Kevin Trilli wrote:
> 
>> For section 5.2.2 Representation, the following addition is suggested for the inclusion of a third party "auditor" element to the tracking resource policy:
>> 
>> An optional member named "Auditor" MAY be provided with a URI of a third party auditor, industry organization, assurance provider or certification authority to indicate the presence of a third party assessment that attests the entity will abide by its tracking policy.
>> 
>> Note: There can be multiple auditors and trusted third parties.
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 06:24:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:31 UTC