W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ACTION-185: Draft specific field proposal for optional auditors

From: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:17:15 -0700
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Message-Id: <B1FFAF2A-023B-40B0-8E0E-032B0EA7BA7A@w3.org>
To: Kevin Trilli <ktrilli@truste.com>
Are we ready to add this to the Tracking Status Resource section?

Also, I thought the suggestion was to have "auditors" rather than "auditor" and then an array of strings of URIs.


On May 24, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Kevin Trilli wrote:

> For section 5.2.2 Representation, the following addition is suggested for the inclusion of a third party "auditor" element to the tracking resource policy:
> An optional member named "Auditor" MAY be provided with a URI of a third party auditor, industry organization, assurance provider or certification authority to indicate the presence of a third party assessment that attests the entity will abide by its tracking policy.
> Note: There can be multiple auditors and trusted third parties.
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 17:17:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:51 UTC