W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > April 2012

RE: ISSUE-130: Web-wide exceptions - iare there objections to permitting those?

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:00:52 -0700
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8023D11A98CB2@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>
<Carriage returns lost somehow - resending as rich text>

User Granted Exceptions  (Exception Type:  1st Party / 3rd Party Domain Pair)

Site-Specific Exception:  Known 1st Party / Known 3rd Party

Site-Wide Exception:  Known 1st Party / *

Web-Wide Exception:  * / Known 3rd Party

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Wiley [mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:56 PM
To: Matthias Schunter
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: RE: ISSUE-130: Web-wide exceptions - iare there objections to permitting those?

Matthias,

It was my understanding we had consensus to allow this conceptually.

User Granted Exceptions  (Exception Type:  1st Party / 3rd Party Domain Pair)

Site-Specific Exception:  Known 1st Party / Known 3rd Party
Site-Wide Exception:  Known 1st Party / *
Web-Wide Exception:  * / Known 3rd Party

- Shane


Mar 28, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matthias Schunter wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> from the lack of discussion on the mailing list, I gather that granting
> a web-wide exception to
> (e.g.) a producer of a widget does not raise huge concerns.
>
> Is there actually consensus on allowing such an exeption? If yes, I'd
> like to close ISSUE-130.
>
>
> Regards,
> matthias
>

Lauren Gelman
BlurryEdge Strategies
415-627-8512
gelman@blurryedge.com
http://blurryedge.com
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 23:01:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:27 UTC