W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests

From: Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:06:38 +0000
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
CC: "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <E56BFC31-A991-41B2-B53A-3FBAE8C87B9E@iabeurope.eu>

I can get you a letter IAB Europe received on this.

Kind regards,
Kimon

----- Reply message -----
From: "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org>
To: "Kimon Zorbas" <vp@iabeurope.eu>
Cc: "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "David Wainberg" <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Jonathan Mayer" <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Subject: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 20:05





Kimon,

this is a very important statement. Do you have a pointer to the CNIL's
opinion here? Because if the CNIL (who was always rather strict) is excluding
analytics, that may set also goals for our work here and change the lines
along the (inherent) conflict we are trying to balance in the compliance
specification.

Best,

Rigo

On Monday 07 November 2011 10:46:41 Kimon Zorbas wrote:
> In general, those exceptions apply to services for which the first party is
> responsible, as e.g. is the case with web analytics (following here CNILís
> position, the French data protection authority).
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:07:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:22 UTC