W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Review of tests upstreamed by implementors

From: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:37:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEoffTCGP18uG9Hb3bUY1j1uF0whjs11Qv9mayD=RULucXGOBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>, public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Rebecca Hauck wrote:
> > This hits on another issue
> > that has also been a bit of a bottleneck which is the requirement* that a
> > review is done by someone outside of your company/organization.
> This isn't actually documented formally anywhere, but I've also heard it
> mentioned numerous times.
Fantasai actually told me this requirement face-to-face a few days ago, and
claimed that it was documented on the CSSWG Testing Wiki page, but I'm not
seeing it now.

Fantasai, did I miss something?


-- Dirk
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 19:38:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:33 UTC