W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Review of tests upstreamed by implementors

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:01:29 -0700
Message-ID: <514B8339.4080409@inkedblade.net>
To: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
CC: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>, public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On 03/20/2013 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org <mailto:tobie@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>     On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Rebecca Hauck wrote:
>     > This hits on another issue
>     > that has also been a bit of a bottleneck which is the requirement* that a
>     > review is done by someone outside of your company/organization.
>
>     This isn't actually documented formally anywhere, but I've also heard it mentioned numerous times.
>
>
> Fantasai actually told me this requirement face-to-face a few days ago, and claimed that it was documented on the CSSWG
> Testing Wiki page, but I'm not seeing it now.
>
> Fantasai, did I miss something?
>
> http://wiki.csswg.org/test/review

I can't find it either. Though the section on test suite governance
makes a reference to it...

Looks like this is what happened:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2008Sep/0002.html

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 22:02:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:33 UTC