W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > October 2004

RE: Overlap between OWL-S and WSDL

From: Jun Shen <jshen@it.swin.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:12:28 +1000
To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c4a9d9$203be4d0$9b07ba88@JSHENPC>

Hi, Bram,

Just try CMU's WSDL2OWL-S.

http://www.daml.ri.cmu.edu/wsdl2owls/

Cheers
Jun

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Mark Bram
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:56 PM
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Subject: Overlap between OWL-S and WSDL



Hi All,

I am interested in creating my own Ontology using OWL-S for an application 
involving distributed multimedia with QoS.

My question involves the overlap between OWL-S and WSDL. I read this from 
the article "OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services":

==
As indicated by Figure 3, the two languages do overlap in the area of 
providing for the specification of what WSDL calls ``abstract types'', 
which in turn are used to characterize the inputs and outputs of services. 
WSDL, by default, specifies abstract types using XML Schema, whereas OWL-S 
allows for the definition of abstract types as (description logic-based) 
OWL classes 5.
==
http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1B/owl-s/owl-s.html
==

Does this mean that chunks of OWL-S defining atomic processes and 
inputs/outputs can be directly re-used as the WSDL operations and messages?

Thanks for any advice!

Rob
:)

-- 
Robert Mark Bram
B.Comp.(Systems Development/Business Systems)
B.Net.Comp.(Hons)
Doctor of Philosophy Student

School of Network Computing
Faculty of Information Technology
Monash University
Peninsula Campus
McMahons Rd
Frankston, VIC 3199
AUSTRALIA

Phone:  61 3 9904 4394
Facsimile:  61 3 9904 4124
Email: robert.bram@infotech.monash.edu.au
Received on Monday, 4 October 2004 06:13:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:57 GMT