Re: Relation between OWL and OWL-S

On Nov 24, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Jun Shen wrote:

> Bijan,
>
> Hope CMU's CODE and your efforts in HTN planning in SHOP2 make OWL-S 
> more
> popular. Easy-to-deploy tools are so important.

No question.

I'll also point to SRI & the Protege groups effort to produce an OWL-S 
editor pluging for Protege, Evren's OWL-S API, and similar efforts.

Of course, CODE and the OWL-S editor are focused on *producing* 
descriptions. What *kind* of description will allow useful automation, 
even within the bound of what OWL-S encourages, is a different issue, 
alas.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.