W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Relation between OWL and OWL-S

From: Daniela CLARO <daniela.claro@eseo.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:18:43 +0100
To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20041124081847.7446E168B@harley.eseo.fr>

Thank you Bijan and Juns for all your answers...

They were so important helping me to understand this relation.

Thank you.
Daniela

-----Message d'origine-----
De : public-sws-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org] De
la part de Bijan Parsia
Envoyé : mercredi 24 novembre 2004 01:07
À : Jun Shen
Cc : public-sws-ig@w3.org
Objet : Re: Relation between OWL and OWL-S


On Nov 24, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Jun Shen wrote:

> Bijan,
>
> Hope CMU's CODE and your efforts in HTN planning in SHOP2 make OWL-S 
> more popular. Easy-to-deploy tools are so important.

No question.

I'll also point to SRI & the Protege groups effort to produce an OWL-S
editor pluging for Protege, Evren's OWL-S API, and similar efforts.

Of course, CODE and the OWL-S editor are focused on *producing*
descriptions. What *kind* of description will allow useful automation, even
within the bound of what OWL-S encourages, is a different issue, alas.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 08:18:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:58 GMT