Re: Revised Owl-S Grammar

From: csp <cspriese@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 22:18:08 +0100 Message-ID: <038901c4c448$24d1b8b0$6ea3fea9@claus14> To: <airfoyle@alum.mit.edu>, <public-sws-ig@w3.org> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:58 GMT

Dear Drew McDermott,

one simple question on this Owl-S grammar-document please:

In section 1 you show a composite process baz ,
but why isnt there a line with precodition in it ?

Thanks for your answer

Claus P.
(cspriese@gmx.de)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Drew McDermott" <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>; <swsl-committee@daml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:54 PM
Subject: Revised Owl-S Grammar

> There were some really stupid typos in the draft of the Owl-S syntax I 
> sent out this morning.  The second example process was mangled, which 
> probably made the whole thing unintelligible.  I've attached an improved 
> version.
> 
>     -- Drew
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>                                    -- Drew McDermott
>                                       Yale Computer Science Department
> 
>