W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > March 2007

Re: data format for gathered information

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:25:32 -0500
Message-ID: <45EC285C.9000202@openlinksw.com>
CC: public-sweo-ig@w3.org

Leo Sauermann wrote:
> Hi Kingsley, SWEO
> Es begab sich aber da Kingsley Idehen zur rechten Zeit 02.03.2007 
> 17:40 folgendes schrieb:
>> Leo Sauermann wrote:
>>> Which classes and properties from SIOC are essentially needed beyond 
>>> the mentioned vocabularies?
>>> please add them to the wiki page, just add a new section on SIOC.
>>> For which information types listed in [2] do we need SIOC?
>>> perhaps you could give some comprehensive RDF examples how data 
>>> expressed in SIOC would look like in our case, please add some RDF 
>>> examples to the wiki page so that we can evaluate this better
>>> (see where there is already one example, just add more)
>>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/DataVocabulary
>>> [2] 
>>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/ClassificationOntology 
>> Leo,
>> I will do just that :-)
> ok, very good.
>> BTW - Also take a look at: 
>> http://wiki.sioc-project.org/index.php/TypesModule
> I see that this is quite a good collection. perhaps also add this link 
> to the wiki page (section on vocabularies, where DC is)
> I made a change to the typesModule, I think you should use RSS in 
> favor of atom/owl.... (atom/owl is not so much as used RSS 1.0)

Yes, SIOC is in a little flux right now. It will settle down this week 
and then I believe it's relevance as a Generic Glue Ontology for his 
effort will be much clearer. All the kinks (source of confusion across 
an myriad of fronts) have been resolved.


> best
> Leo



Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 14:26:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:52 UTC