W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [SWEO][Logos] RFC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:06:36 -0400
To: bnowack@appmosphere.com
Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFEEFC6E59.AA73B6FC-ON852572F9.00584CC2-852572F9.00587D17@us.ibm.com>

7 and 9 do absolutely nothing for me. Too abstract, maybe.

I think 1 is quite clever, but I don't think it really communicates 
enough, esp. when I think about it scaled down for little Web page badges 
and the like.

So of the remaining candidates, I prefer number 4.

Lee


Benjamin wrote on 06/13/2007 11:22:38 AM:

> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> During the last weeks and today's telcon, we managed to reduce the 
> list of Semantic Web logo proposals to 4 possible drafts [1]. Now 
> I'd like to ask the group for feedback: your preferred one(s), 
> which one(s) you think we should eliminate, whether we should 
> forget them all, etc. (If you think they're all crap and you 
> have an idea for the ultimate logo, you can still contact me, 
> but please do so asap.)
> 
> Please send your comments before the next telcon so that we can
> then decide how to move on.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Benjamin
> 
> 
> [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos
> 
> --
> Benjamin Nowack
> http://bnode.org/
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 16:06:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:38 GMT