- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:06:36 -0400
- To: bnowack@appmosphere.com
- Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
7 and 9 do absolutely nothing for me. Too abstract, maybe. I think 1 is quite clever, but I don't think it really communicates enough, esp. when I think about it scaled down for little Web page badges and the like. So of the remaining candidates, I prefer number 4. Lee Benjamin wrote on 06/13/2007 11:22:38 AM: > > > Hi all, > > During the last weeks and today's telcon, we managed to reduce the > list of Semantic Web logo proposals to 4 possible drafts [1]. Now > I'd like to ask the group for feedback: your preferred one(s), > which one(s) you think we should eliminate, whether we should > forget them all, etc. (If you think they're all crap and you > have an idea for the ultimate logo, you can still contact me, > but please do so asap.) > > Please send your comments before the next telcon so that we can > then decide how to move on. > > Thanks in advance, > Benjamin > > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos > > -- > Benjamin Nowack > http://bnode.org/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 16:06:50 UTC