W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [SWEO][Logos] RFC

From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:53 +0200
To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <PM-GA.20070613200553.CD0D0.3.1D@mailout.appmosphere.com>


My "votes":

 1: 0
 4: -1
 7: +1
 9: 0


And the designer's comments I received (ugh ;):

 1 and 7 are what you could expect from a branding
 agency('s 1st or 2nd iteration). They have 
 potential, but may need more work. 7 may look
 more like a company logo than a technology one,
 though. 7 is more "dynamic" than 1.
 
 4 doesn't really comunicate the values. It's
 cute, but not professional in the current state.

 9 is actually a variation of 7, with a clearer
 "S", and a more obvious relation to the Web's
 graph structure. The circles make it more 
 "friendly" than the other shapes. 


ben

--
Benjamin Nowack
http://bnode.org/


On 13.06.2007 17:22:38, Benjamin Nowack wrote:
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>During the last weeks and today's telcon, we managed to reduce the 
>list of Semantic Web logo proposals to 4 possible drafts [1]. Now 
>I'd like to ask the group for feedback: your preferred one(s), 
>which one(s) you think we should eliminate, whether we should 
>forget them all, etc. (If you think they're all crap and you 
>have an idea for the ultimate logo, you can still contact me, 
>but please do so asap.)
>
>Please send your comments before the next telcon so that we can
>then decide how to move on.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Benjamin
>
>
>[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos
>
>--
>Benjamin Nowack
>http://bnode.org/
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:06:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:38 GMT