W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Semantic Web according to wikipedia

From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:27:43 -0000
To: "'Danny Ayers'" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20070215202741.E088C187C8F0A@postie1.hosting365.ie>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Danny Ayers
> 
> On 15/02/07, Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com> wrote:
> >
> > I know this has come up before but I'll ask the question again.
> >
> > What is the W3C's position of the interpretation of the Semantic Web on
> > wikipedia [1].
> >
> > What is the rest of the group's thoughts about it?
> 
> I was pleasantly surprised by the entry, most of it seems reasonably
> accurate - very good to see the timbl quotes.
> 
> > It's funny that everyone [2] knows that the SM is a W3C ambition, yet
they
> > decide to link to the ever so reliable wiki.
> 
> Hmm, that might suggest the W3C's intro pages need work.

That was the first thought that came into my head.

> 
> > I could be cheeky and ensure it's update to include Content Labels. Or,
is that cheeky?!
> 
> I think it's entirely justified - there's a rather ill-informed
> section on "Censorship, and privacy" which could do with a
> counter-view, and Content Labels could add a good positive note.

Glad you think so. Looks like we'll have to create a few pages on the
subject to link to - looks like a project by itself.

[snip]
> 
> If anyone has a minute, the Layer Cake they've got is a little stale...

Agree totally. Do we have any images with people, search tools, web pages
etc? 
 
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 20:27:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:35 GMT