W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > October 2008

RE: ISSUE-173 clarification

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:44:27 +0200
To: "'Sean Bechhofer'" <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: "'SWD Working SWD'" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001d01c9345d$13ac4670$3b04d350$@com>

My error, please withdraw comment.

Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Sean Bechhofer
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:34 PM
> To: Jeremy Carroll
> Cc: SWD Working SWD
> Subject: ISSUE-173 clarification
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremy,
> 
> In ISSUE-173, you comment:
> 
> [[
> 13) 9.6.4 (clarification of substantive material)
> 
> Unlike similar paras, this one introduces a normative requirement (in
> the first
> sentence).
> I suggest this should be added as S35a.
> ]]
> 
> The first sentence of 9.6.4 discusses the disjointness of
> skos:Concept and skos:Collection. However this constraint /is/
> already present as S36. Is there something else you were highlighting
> here?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Sean
> 
> --
> Sean Bechhofer
> School of Computer Science
> University of Manchester
> sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
> http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 15:45:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 October 2008 15:45:18 GMT