W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > October 2008

ISSUE-173 clarification

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:33:58 +0100
Message-Id: <13AECA8D-0212-4228-97FB-3A7E80160E7A@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>


Jeremy,

In ISSUE-173, you comment:

[[
13) 9.6.4 (clarification of substantive material)

Unlike similar paras, this one introduces a normative requirement (in  
the first
sentence).
I suggest this should be added as S35a.
]]

The first sentence of 9.6.4 discusses the disjointness of  
skos:Concept and skos:Collection. However this constraint /is/  
already present as S36. Is there something else you were highlighting  
here?

Thanks,
	
	Sean

--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 13:35:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 October 2008 13:35:09 GMT