W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 04 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:07:52 +0100
Message-ID: <49134E98.6070501@few.vu.nl>
To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>


>>
>>
>>> PROPOSED: to resolve issues 140, 141, 146, 133, 144, 145, 149, 150,
>>> 152, 162, 160, 171, 172, 178 and 180 (part 1) as described in
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0287.html
>>
>> I'm ok for sending the answers proposed for all these comments. But I 
>> don't know if that *resolves* the issues: there are some changes that 
>> commenters have to approve of, aren't there?
>
> The key thing is that if the commenter is happy, then I believe that 
> the editors have the backing of the WG to resolve the issues without 
> coming back again. That's how this was interpreted during the call:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-swd-irc#T16-21-34
>
> I assume the minutes will be clearer :-)

Yes, there was no ambiguity during the telconference.
Note that I sent this mail before the teleconference. But my mails just 
went very wrong over the past days. I apologize for the hundreds of 
answers about 181-185, by the way :-/

Antoin
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 11:53:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 November 2008 11:53:18 GMT