On 4 Nov 2008, at 16:01, Antoine Isaac wrote: > > Hi Alistair, > >> PROPOSED: to resolve issues 140, 141, 146, 133, 144, 145, 149, 150, >> 152, 162, 160, 171, 172, 178 and 180 (part 1) as described in >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0287.html > > I'm ok for sending the answers proposed for all these comments. But > I don't know if that *resolves* the issues: there are some changes > that commenters have to approve of, aren't there? The key thing is that if the commenter is happy, then I believe that the editors have the backing of the WG to resolve the issues without coming back again. That's how this was interpreted during the call: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-swd-irc#T16-21-34 I assume the minutes will be clearer :-) Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhoferReceived on Thursday, 6 November 2008 17:41:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 November 2008 17:41:42 GMT