- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:40:18 +0000
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 4 Nov 2008, at 16:01, Antoine Isaac wrote: > > Hi Alistair, > >> PROPOSED: to resolve issues 140, 141, 146, 133, 144, 145, 149, 150, >> 152, 162, 160, 171, 172, 178 and 180 (part 1) as described in >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0287.html > > I'm ok for sending the answers proposed for all these comments. But > I don't know if that *resolves* the issues: there are some changes > that commenters have to approve of, aren't there? The key thing is that if the commenter is happy, then I believe that the editors have the backing of the WG to resolve the issues without coming back again. That's how this was interpreted during the call: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-swd-irc#T16-21-34 I assume the minutes will be clearer :-) Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 17:41:41 UTC