Re: [XSCH] finished updating doc

Jeremy,

> I've finished updating the editors' draft.

OK - I will check it soon.

> Please let me know if there are any further changes you feel we need for 
> this round of review.

I want to update the references in the semantics part. I expect to get it done by the end of this week.

Greetings,
Jeff

--
Dr. Jeff Z. Pan (http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~jpan/)
Department of Computing Science, The University of Aberdeen


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
To: "Jeff Z. Pan" <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: [XSCH] finished updating doc


> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> I've finished updating the editors' draft.
> 
> Four versions snapshot for today are:
> 
> Using the XPath eq solution
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20051026/xpath
> 
> Making all primitive datatypes disjoint
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20051026/derive
> 
> A file having both solutions in it
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20051026/Both
> 
> A version with Both solutions and most of the deleted text (this is the 
> master copy)
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20051026/
> 
> Please let me know if there are any further changes you feel we need for 
> this round of review.
> 
> (I should update some of the references, e.g. the SPARQL, XPath and 
> XQuery ones are out of date)
> 
> The biggest change from the plan was as I worked through Ashok's comment 
> I realised I hadn't understood target namespace in XML Schema, and I 
> read up and added some additional text on this topic.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
>