W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > February 2005

Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:50:56 -0500
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050209195056.GZ29875@homer.w3.org>

* Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl> [2005-02-09 19:03+0100]
> 1. ADMIN (15 min)
> Roll call
> Regrets:  Carroll

Regrets, unfortunately, from me. (f2f Quatro project meeting)

Sorry to have to miss another meeting. I have commented 
on various parts of the agenda below in an attempt to 
compensate for being absent.

> PROPOSED next telecon
>    Feb 24, 1800 UTC

Regrets also, I'll be on a plane to Boston :(

> Tech Plenary / ftf
> http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html
I'd like to remind SWBPD WG folk that there is also
a Semantic Web Interest Group meeting on the monday/tuesday
of TP week, and that they're very welecome. We have a 
thread on semantic-web@w3.org regarding agenda proposals;
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2005Feb/0034.html

On the SWIG front, I'd also like to mention that I've updated the
SWIG homepage, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/
and that www-rdf-interest@w3.org has been replaced by 
semantic-web@w3.org as the main SWIG mailing list. Please 
use the latter; see

> 2.2: DAWG: UNSAID and SOUCE issues
> See Dan Connoly;'s messge:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jan/0158.html

I have been looking at SPARQL. I believe SOURCE (or 'GRAPH', if the 
keyword gets renamed) is pretty essential. UNSAID, if it can be 
given a clear semantics and implimented efficiently (beyond my
competence to tell) would also be useful, but is not nearly as 
important for v1.0.
> ACTION: ralph to make a "List of WG documents" more apparent from the
>   home page
> 3.1 PORT (Alistair)
> PROPOSED to publish the SKOS Guide as 1st Working Draft:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0034.html

I support publishing SKOS WD as-is, or with any minor tweaks Alistair
needs to make. The open issues section now addresses my 
main concern, which is the relationship between SKOS and RDF/OWL, 
ie. when are people supposed to model things as SKOS 'concepts' vs
simply using RDF classes, properties and individuals?

(is http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/spec/ supposed to go out at
same time? or afterwards? wondering about cross-linking issues...).

> 3.3 WordNet (Aldo)
> ACTION: guus discuss Mark's participation in Wordnet tf with Brian
> ACTION: Brian and DanBri talk about Wordnet document

We talked. I believe last year. We could probably talk again...
> Overview of WordNet resources:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0029.html

I should note that Brad Allen of Siderean also offered some Wordnet
/ RDF code. I'd be happy to take an action to follow that up, to 
have it tracked here. 
> 4, AOB

I guess I should give advance warning that I may need to leave the 
WG post-April, depending on details of my funding situation. I hope to 
spend some decent time on SKOS and Vocab Management work before then
(likely in late March and April rather than pre-Mar22, when most of 
my time is going on EU project proposal authoring).
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 19:50:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:41 UTC