W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: rotated path segment proposal

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:29:44 -0700
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, Dirk Schulze <dirk@dschulze.com>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA53826D.6E50%lrosenth@adobe.com>
Not according to what Vincent quoted.

	"If a path data command contains an incorrect set of parameters, then the
given path data command is rendered up to and including the
	last correctly defined path segment"

That says that it will stop as soon as it hits the new operators.  So not
drawn incorrectly - not drawn!


On 7/25/11 8:02 PM, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

>Leonard Rosenthol:
>> So in this case, the second segment in the examples would NOT render
>> in existing implementations – and (IMO) that would be BAD (as it's
>> data loss).
>I don’t see what the problem is with this.  Even if we did have a path
>syntax error behaviour that meant that the R/F commands ignored and the
>following segments are still rendered, the shape is going to be wrong.
>If we want to, we could have a feature string so that authors could have
>a fallback path using <switch>.
>Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 00:30:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:13 UTC