W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Tests required for recent changes to SVG 1.1 Second Edition

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:03:30 +1000
To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090602060330.GB23033@arc.mcc.id.au>
Cameron McCormack:
> > How about in the spec (apart from the @charset and other attributes
> > that we don’t have)?

Erik Dahlström:
> Assuming "the spec" meant SVG 1.1, the spec doesn't mandate any
> particular behaviour for @type. It only "identifies the scripting
> language for the given script element".

Yes I meant 1.1.

> > Do you know if the behaviour required by the SVG spec matches what
> > HTML 5 requires in terms of what to do with @type?
>
> Well, SVG 1.1 doesn't say really, so it's compatible in that sense.
> Handling the @type on <svg:script> the same as <html:script> is allowed
> as far as I can tell.
>
> If instead we look at SVGT1.2, then more of the script
> processing is described, but I don't see wording similar to
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/semantics.html#running-a-script and @type
> handling still isn't covered.

OK.  Well, maybe we should just fix it in 2.0 and not worry about it for
now.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 06:04:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 06:04:17 GMT