W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Tests required for recent changes to SVG 1.1 Second Edition

From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:20:54 +0200
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uuucc4jgdhsuf5@gnorps.linkoping.osa>
On Sat, 30 May 2009 06:02:28 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

> Cameron McCormack:
>> > OK.  Is SVG’s behaviour consistent with this?
>
> Erik Dahlström:
>> In Opera yes, it's handled the same way.
>
> How about in the spec (apart from the @charset and other attributes that
> we don’t have)?

Assuming "the spec" meant SVG 1.1, the spec doesn't mandate any particular behaviour for @type. It only "identifies the scripting language for the given script element".

> Do you know if the behaviour required by the SVG spec
> matches what HTML 5 requires in terms of what to do with @type?

Well, SVG 1.1 doesn't say really, so it's compatible in that sense. Handling the @type on <svg:script> the same as <html:script> is allowed as far as I can tell.

If instead we look at SVGT1.2, then more of the script processing is described, but I don't see wording similar to http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/semantics.html#running-a-script and @type handling still isn't covered.

-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 10:19:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 June 2009 10:19:55 GMT