Hi, SVG- We're holding a WebApps WG F2F, so I won't be available this week. I think it would be helpful if the SVG-in-text/html topic were discussed and sent off soon. Sorry- -Doug Erik Dahlström wrote (on 6/30/08 2:24 PM): > > Hello svg-wg, > > here's the draft agenda for the July 1 telcon: > > * Open Actions / Issues > > ISSUE-2004 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0153.html > > * SVG Tiny 1.2 comparisons of IRIs for resource documents > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0166.html > > * [Fwd: SVGt 1.2 Tests: Rationale of fonts-elem-05-t] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0160.html > > * www-svg > > SVGt 1.2 Tests: text-text-06-t assumes that text x/y will not break > ligatures > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Jun/0027.html > > SVGt 1.2 Tests: fonts-desc-05-t has arc path command in glyph data > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Jun/0048.html > > "Liveness" of SVGMatrix > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Jun/0067.html > > limitations of units and a proposed "percent+offset" extension > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Jun/0068.html > > > -- Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDFReceived on Tuesday, 1 July 2008 05:14:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 1 July 2008 05:15:00 GMT