W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-12@w3.org > April 2019

Re: Draft charter

From: ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:38:52 -0400
To: public-sparql-12@w3.org
Message-Id: <27828C7A-F957-4D8E-8FC1-E4926A515A3C@apache.org>
Hi, Andy!

Under "Decision Process" I find "It is expected that participants can earn Committer status through a history of valuable contributions as is common in open source projects", but I don't see a process described by which folks are invited or confirmed to be committers, or who actually does the invitation or confirmation. Did you have thoughts about that?

ajs6f

> On Apr 2, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Here is a draft of a charter:
> 
>  https://w3c.github.io/sparql-12/charter.html
> 
> It is taken from the W3C CG-template with the {TBD} sections filled out.
> http://w3c.github.io/cg-charter/CGCharter.html
> 
> source:
>  https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/docs/charter.html
> 
> issue:
>  https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/2
> or the mailing list.
> 
> There is an issue for the charter on github. It is help if CG participants who agree indicate with a +1 reaction.
> 
> Of note is the section on technical work taken from the CG-template:
> 
> """
> If the group uses GitHub, all technical work will occur in its GitHub repositories (and not in mailing list discussions).
> """
> 
> I don't take that to stop discussions on public list, realistically, they will happen, but the place of record is github.
> 
> There is a choice point for the CG here: github OR mailing list as the record. Given features evolving separately, I see the GH issues with its forum format makes long term discussions easier.
> 
>    Andy
> 
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2019 19:39:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 2 April 2019 19:39:18 UTC