Re: Draft charter

Jerven created issue #3 for this.

https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/3

     Andy

On 02/04/2019 20:38, ajs6f wrote:
> Hi, Andy!
> 
> Under "Decision Process" I find "It is expected that participants can earn Committer status through a history of valuable contributions as is common in open source projects", but I don't see a process described by which folks are invited or confirmed to be committers, or who actually does the invitation or confirmation. Did you have thoughts about that?
> 
> ajs6f
> 
>> On Apr 2, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Here is a draft of a charter:
>>
>>   https://w3c.github.io/sparql-12/charter.html
>>
>> It is taken from the W3C CG-template with the {TBD} sections filled out.
>> http://w3c.github.io/cg-charter/CGCharter.html
>>
>> source:
>>   https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/docs/charter.html
>>
>> issue:
>>   https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/2
>> or the mailing list.
>>
>> There is an issue for the charter on github. It is help if CG participants who agree indicate with a +1 reaction.
>>
>> Of note is the section on technical work taken from the CG-template:
>>
>> """
>> If the group uses GitHub, all technical work will occur in its GitHub repositories (and not in mailing list discussions).
>> """
>>
>> I don't take that to stop discussions on public list, realistically, they will happen, but the place of record is github.
>>
>> There is a choice point for the CG here: github OR mailing list as the record. Given features evolving separately, I see the GH issues with its forum format makes long term discussions easier.
>>
>>     Andy
>>
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2019 10:56:54 UTC