- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:29:21 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 09/21/2014 09:03 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: > The point is that now we have JSON-LD the syntax for JSON has allready been agreed upon and is widely adopted. > All that remains to be agreed upon is the vocabulary for the use cases we want to solve. Then the work is done. > There is not an additional job to determine the syntax. > > This removes a huge burden on development of a convention, which is great, because there is a lot to do. +1 I would like to add that while I <3 JSON (and JSON-LD) I see no reason to prevent others in a future from leveraging capacities of other RDF serializations. For example Ruben Verborgh does some IMO very nifty streaming APIs[1] where Turtle to my understanding comes more useful. Once again while I would prefer to keep turtle serialization away from our conversations, I see no reason to *burn bridges* in our architecture to prevent broader web community to take advantage of technologies we decide to put outside of the scope for this working group! [1] http://client.linkeddatafragments.org/
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:31:35 UTC