- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 23:09:29 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 09/03/2014 07:58 PM, James M Snell wrote: > Arnaud, to keep things from getting too muddy on that page, perhaps we > can use the Discussion page to discuss agenda item proposals, and keep > the "Agenda" section clear for finalized items? https://www.w3.org/wiki/Talk:Socialwg/2014-10-27 I just added point about: *using Schema.org - issues with Terms & Governance* Maybe discussing it F2F could lead to some graceful resolutions. We already touch this topic towards the end of our last teleconf https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-09-09-minutes
Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 21:11:43 UTC