- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:05:20 +1000
- To: public-socialweb@w3c.org
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 01:07:06 UTC
On 9 Sep 2014, at 09:31, Owen Shepherd <owen.shepherd@e43.eu> wrote: > But I feel it would be worth it - this simplifies the data model for everyone interacting with the protocol, and makes it useful as a data model. It would make the data much easier to rationalise, and help clarify what data “stands alone” vs being an integral part of some other object. I totally agree. Having a separation between model and syntax(es) should be be the norm for W3C specs. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 01:07:06 UTC