W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > April 2011

Fwd: Re: Question for CXF developers - level of support for W3C SOAP/JMS specification

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:45:10 -0700
Message-ID: <4DADCA26.5040803@tibco.com>
To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Follow-up note from Daniel Kulp - looks like Protocol-2070 is tested in CXF.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Question for CXF developers - level of support for W3C 
SOAP/JMS specification
Date: 	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:49:59 -0400
From: 	Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
To: 	<dev@cxf.apache.org>
CC: 	Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>, Peter Easton <peaston@progress.com>

On Monday 18 April 2011 6:22:57 PM Eric Johnson wrote:

>  >  Looking at the test suite itself:
>  >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/systests/transports/src/test/ja
>  >  va/org/apache/cxf/jms/testsuite/testcases
>  Oh, excellent - I hadn't actually noticed where those were in the source
>  tree. Looks like they moved slightly:
>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/systests/transport-jms/src/test/j
>  ava/org/apache/cxf/jms/testsuite/services/

Yea.   The JMS stuff was split out a week or so ago to help reduce some build
times and dependency things and such.   Glad you found it.   :-)

>  >  I do see some tests that are missing from the official suite:
>  >  http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html
>  >
>  >  What I DON'T know is if the features tested by those tests are not
>  >  implemented in CXF or just not tested or possibly tested as part of one
>  >  of the other tests.    If anyone would like to fill those in, I'd be
>  >  happy to review and apply any patches.
>  That, in and of itself is useful - some of those tests don't matter,
>  because they don't address portions of the specification that are
>  normative (we "demoted" the WSDL 2.0 support, because we didn't
>  anticipate two interoperable versions.)
>  I did a cross-reference on all those tests, and it looks like the one
>  we're missing is Protocol-2070

Well, the good news is that I believe it is already supported.   If you look
in method testReplyToNameParameters there are some tests for testing to make
sure the topicReplyToName and such are properly set on the endpoint and the
does parse those attributes.   Thus, I'm "pretty sure" it already works.
Obviously a real test would be great.  :-)

Daniel Kulp
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 17:45:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:22 UTC