W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > April 2011

Re: ACTION-244 : Fwd: Re: Question for CXF developers - level of support for W3C SOAP/JMS specification

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:58:31 -0700
Message-ID: <4DB5FC97.7030601@tibco.com>
To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Reviewing the details, I believe this completes ACTION-244, and the 
answer is "yes", CXF supports WSDL.

-Eric.

On 4/19/11 10:45 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Follow-up note from Daniel Kulp - looks like Protocol-2070 is tested 
> in CXF.
>
> -Eric.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     Re: Question for CXF developers - level of support for 
> W3C SOAP/JMS specification
> Date:     Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:49:59 -0400
> From:     Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
> To: <dev@cxf.apache.org>
> CC:     Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>, Peter Easton 
> <peaston@progress.com>
>
>
>
> On Monday 18 April 2011 6:22:57 PM Eric Johnson wrote:
>
>> >  Looking at the test suite itself:
>> >  
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/systests/transports/src/test/ja
>> >  va/org/apache/cxf/jms/testsuite/testcases
>>
>>  Oh, excellent - I hadn't actually noticed where those were in the 
>> source
>>  tree. Looks like they moved slightly:
>>
>>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/systests/transport-jms/src/test/j 
>>
>>  ava/org/apache/cxf/jms/testsuite/services/
>
> Yea.   The JMS stuff was split out a week or so ago to help reduce 
> some build
> times and dependency things and such.   Glad you found it.   :-)
>
>> >  I do see some tests that are missing from the official suite:
>> >  http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html
>> >
>> >  What I DON'T know is if the features tested by those tests are not
>> >  implemented in CXF or just not tested or possibly tested as part 
>> of one
>> >  of the other tests.    If anyone would like to fill those in, I'd be
>> >  happy to review and apply any patches.
>>
>>  That, in and of itself is useful - some of those tests don't matter,
>>  because they don't address portions of the specification that are
>>  normative (we "demoted" the WSDL 2.0 support, because we didn't
>>  anticipate two interoperable versions.)
>>
>>  I did a cross-reference on all those tests, and it looks like the one
>>  we're missing is Protocol-2070
>
> Well, the good news is that I believe it is already supported.   If 
> you look
> in
> rt/transports/jms/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/jms/uri/JMSEndpointTest.java 
>
> in method testReplyToNameParameters there are some tests for testing 
> to make
> sure the topicReplyToName and such are properly set on the endpoint 
> and the
> class:
> rt/transports/jms/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/jms/uri/JMSEndpointParser.java 
>
> does parse those attributes.   Thus, I'm "pretty sure" it already works.
> Obviously a real test would be great.  :-)
>
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 22:59:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 25 April 2011 22:59:05 GMT