W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-ui@w3.org > December 2007

Re: SIG at CHI Florence/collective submission and beyond

From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:41:19 +0700
Message-ID: <c09b00eb0712022141t325d8d2ev3f1e13da2fd69a35@mail.gmail.com>
To: ddegler@ipgems.com
Cc: public-semweb-ui@w3.org
Douane and all

I have drafted a simple SIG proposal based on bits already discussed, that
Emmanuelle has approved and signed up to.

At this stage however, I am also not 100 percent sure I can be around in
Florence, as I have conflicting commitments.

Anyone else interested in proposing this and likely to be at the event in
please email me offlist, and I ll circulate my notes should you be able to
add/edit them further and take this forward should I not be around



On Dec 1, 2007 2:53 AM, Duane Degler <ddegler@ipgems.com> wrote:

> The idea if a SIG sounds interesting, and brings the subject into the main
> conference programme.
> Hopefully you remain interested in submitting a paper to the workshop - we
> look forward to a lively discussion and interesting examples! Still 2 weeks
> to submit (due on Dec 14th). Of course, you can always submit early. ;-)
> Sorry I missed what sounds like good discussions at ISWC07. See you at
> CHI.
> Duane Degler
> Co-organizer SWUI at CHI
> http://swui.webscience.org/SWUI2008CHI/
> Sent via BlackBerry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:18:35
> To:<paola.dimaio@gmail.com>,<public-semweb-ui@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: SIG at CHI Florence/collective submission and beyond
> Hi Paola and all,
> Sorry for the delay in my response. I was in another city again :(
> I'm reading now your proposal and I will answer to you in some minutes :-)
> See you..
> Emmanuelle
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: paola.dimaio@gmail.com [mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com]
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de noviembre de 2007 9:53
> Para: paola.dimaio@gmail.com; public-semweb-ui@w3.org
> Asunto: Fwd: SIG at CHI Florence/collective submission and beyond
> Greets all
> I am circulating this email to all who expressed an interest in a possible
> IG either remotely on the W3C list or in person in Busan. It was great to
> meet you all.
> Following Tom Heath's suggestion, I have started a draft for submission of
> SIG at CHI Florence, it can take up to 10 authors and 4 pages. I have then
> realised there is an open call for papers here
> http://swui.webscience.org/SWUI2008CHI/
> Emmanuelle, shall we work on a paper, or is the idea of a SIG still worth
> pursuing?
> In order to start an incubator at W3C it is necessary to have three
> sponsor
> members (I dont belong to any organisation officially, although I work
> informally with a few members).
>  Some of you suggested an IG is formed, I would encourage the pusual of
> this
> idea.
>  Let me now if you need my input anywhere along the line.
> Either way, I am would like to see an 'open'  workgroup, as suggested on
> the
> main W3C list,  to collectively work on furthering this area of research,
> which appears in need to be studied further and in depth, as it briefly
> surfaced at our lunchtime meeting in Busan
> I have a few deliverables in mind and I am starting some jobs in this
> direction in the forthcoming weeks with different people. Please share
> your
> ideas for collaboration beyond the IG proposal
> I am happy to use the existing wiki and mailing list for this and other
> possible developments,
> swuiwiki.webscience.org
> and
> http://swui.semanticweb.org/
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-ui/
>  provided there is a clear and explicit and consensual IP policy (still
> waiting for a reply on that one , Avi and Max!). Not sure what is the
> situation there but I need to preserve copyright  of my work for research
> and other purposes (although I happy to collaborate and share, I  retain
> commercial rights over my contributions), In other projects I share
> copyright with contributors  based on effort, either equal or proportional
> terms, depending on agreement.
> Should the IP issue not be addressed satisfactorily by the existing
> resources, and alternatively, or in addition to them, we can start
> additional resources/collaborative workspaces to develop joint
> projects/programmes
> Look forward to your ideas an input on how to proceed next Please let us
> all
> know what you think and plans for cooperation
> Best
> Paola Di Maio

Paola Di Maio
School of IT
Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 05:41:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:52 UTC