W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2006

RE: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.

From: Donald Doherty <donald.doherty@brainstage.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:49:53 -0400
To: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Cc: "'Alan Rector'" <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>, "'Robert Stevens'" <robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>, "'Matthias Samwald'" <samwald@gmx.at>
Message-ID: <001c01c67e13$9234f3a0$0202fea9@Brainstage>


It seems that NeurWeb provides a great platform for us (the BIONT team) to
experiment with. Some of the specific mappings you suggested for the
Parkinson's disease use case should work.

Perhaps we can come up with a bridge ontology to try linking NeuroWeb with
an atlas such as http://brainmaps.org and one or more of the sites with
details on antibodies, genes, and...?


Donald Doherty, Ph.D.
Brainstage Research, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:46 PM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Cc: Alan Rector; Robert Stevens; Matthias Samwald
Subject: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.

Kei Chung has updated the Senselab BioRDF here.


In it he points to the NeuroWeb web site

Which contains links to OWL ontologies for cocodat and neurondb (plus  
a sampling of data).

Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For  
instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf  
class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with  
these values. What do people think of this?

I don't think we have a TC planned for this coming tuesday, but if  
there is sufficient interest we can set one up. Otherwise we can talk  
about it the following week.

Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 02:48:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:26 UTC