W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2006

Re: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:54:29 -0400
Message-Id: <7b18863e1622920454b610ae0a757595@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: "John Barkley" <jbarkley@nist.gov>

Hi John,

Thanks, I had read that before but had forgot that this was 
specifically mentioned in that document. I'm still trying to understand 
the full implications. In particular, I think that OWL 1.1 may remove 
the restriction that motivated this pattern, but that there may be 
problems - Just wrote this note to the OWL list, we'll see what folks 
say:

http://lists.mindswap.org/pipermail/owl/2006-May/000310.html

The OWL 1.1 web site is http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/

-Alan


On May 22, 2006, at 11:37 AM, John Barkley wrote:

>
> alan,
>
>> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For
>> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf
>> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with
>> these values. What do people think of this?
>
> This is an often used technique to keep ontologies/knowledge bases OWL 
> DL.
> There is a very nice article on this subject at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-classes-as-values
>
> jb
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
> To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> Cc: "Alan Rector" <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>; "Robert Stevens"
> <robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>; "Matthias Samwald" <samwald@gmx.at>
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:46 PM
> Subject: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.
>
>
>>
>> Kei Chung has updated the Senselab BioRDF here.
>>
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/SenseLab
>>
>> In it he points to the NeuroWeb web site
>>
>> http://128.36.123.50/NeuroWeb/
>>
>> Which contains links to OWL ontologies for cocodat and neurondb (plus
>> a sampling of data).
>>
>> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For
>> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf
>> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with
>> these values. What do people think of this?
>>
>> I don't think we have a TC planned for this coming tuesday, but if
>> there is sufficient interest we can set one up. Otherwise we can talk
>> about it the following week.
>>
>> -Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 16:54:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:43 GMT