W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2006

Re: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.

From: John Barkley <jbarkley@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:37:34 -0400
Message-ID: <04ae01c67db5$a5cfcf10$8a3a0681@ncsl.nist.gov>
To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

alan,

> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For
> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf
> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with
> these values. What do people think of this?

This is an often used technique to keep ontologies/knowledge bases OWL DL.
There is a very nice article on this subject at:

http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-classes-as-values

jb


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Cc: "Alan Rector" <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>; "Robert Stevens"
<robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>; "Matthias Samwald" <samwald@gmx.at>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.


>
> Kei Chung has updated the Senselab BioRDF here.
>
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/SenseLab
>
> In it he points to the NeuroWeb web site
>
> http://128.36.123.50/NeuroWeb/
>
> Which contains links to OWL ontologies for cocodat and neurondb (plus
> a sampling of data).
>
> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For
> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf
> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with
> these values. What do people think of this?
>
> I don't think we have a TC planned for this coming tuesday, but if
> there is sufficient interest we can set one up. Otherwise we can talk
> about it the following week.
>
> -Alan
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 15:39:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:43 GMT