Ian Wilson wrote: > That would be great. Since these graphs change over time, do archived > annual snapshots make sense? Any thoughts on how you might derive these > subgraphs? You are likely more familiar than anyone else with these graphs. > > The separate graphs you provide for distribution are already nicely > divided (e.g. Taxonomy, Sequence, GO, etc.) - so, I was thinking for > benchmarking purposes, it would be nice to have these graphs > incorporated into the subgraphs defined for benchmarking. http://www.isb-sib.ch/~ejain/rdf/data-for-benchmarks/Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:11:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:31 GMT