W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Oracle Uniprot RDF data set and benchmarks

From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:08:07 +0100
Message-ID: <43EA87E7.1090005@isb-sib.ch>
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org

Ian Wilson wrote:
> That would be great. Since these graphs change over time, do archived 
> annual snapshots make sense? Any thoughts on how you might derive these 
> subgraphs? You are likely more familiar than anyone else with these graphs.
> The separate graphs you provide for distribution are already nicely 
> divided (e.g. Taxonomy, Sequence, GO, etc.) - so, I was thinking for 
> benchmarking purposes, it would be nice to have these graphs 
> incorporated into the subgraphs defined for benchmarking.

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:11:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:25 UTC