- From: Vinay K. Chaudhri <Vinay.Chaudhri@sri.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:25:54 -0800
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hello All: The subject line of this thread has been interesting. It has a very regular structure, and easily amenable to semantic tagging. <name>Vinay K. Chaudhri</name> <organization>SRI International</organization> In the true semantic web sense these annotations should be pointing to some standard ontology out there. And why are we limiting only the subject line to tagging? Why not tag the whole message? From this, you may guess that my background is in knowledge representation, and knowledge acquisition. I have been working on large shared knowledge bases for over ten years. I was a contributor to OKBC, and XOL. More recently, I have been developing a knowledge acquisition to acquire knowledge from science text books in a way that it can be used to answer questions in an advanced placement exam. More information on the project is at: http://www.ai.sri.com/project/aura We are very interested to apply this technology to semantic web for life sciences. The publishing industry seems like a particularly good match. We look forward to participating in the upcoming workshop and discussions, and showing off what we have been doing. Keep Smiling! Vinay.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 20:29:09 UTC