- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:55:32 +0100
- To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Maxime, I'll ask about the 303 thing - I see your point. Meanwhile I've fixed the 403 problem in the relevant directories. I'll add the other serialisations when I get a minute but right now I'm up against Proposal submission deadlines (along with a lot of other Europeans!) Phil On 20/04/2017 22:17, Maxime Lefrançois wrote: > Hi Phil, > > thank you, that's already excellent, sosa, ssn,ssn-dul, ssnx, are loaded > properly (at least) by Protégé and vowl. > > about the 303 redirection to the index.html, my understanding was that 303 > can mean "I redirect you to another resource that describes what you're > looking for". > I won't fight about this, it's already great the aforementioned files are > available at their URLs. > > I just pushed the .rdf versions of sosa, ssn, ssnx, ssn-dul, in the same > folder. Sorry for not having generated them before. > > Best, > Maxime > > > Le jeu. 20 avr. 2017 à 22:30, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> a écrit : > >> Hi Maxime, pls see inline below. >> >> On 18/04/2017 15:28, Maxime Lefrançois wrote: >>> Dear Phil, all, >>> >>> The ontologies developed by the SSN subgroup are ready to be published on >>> the W3C for wide review. They are: >>> >>> - SOSA: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/sosa.ttl -> >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/ >> >> Done >> >>> - SOSA: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/ssn.ttl -> >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/ >> >> Done >> >>> - SSNX: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/ssnx.ttl -> >>> https://www.w3.org/2017/01/ssn-ssnx/ >> >> Done, with the ttl file and a generated .owl file served through conneg. >> >> >>> - SSN-DUL: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/ssn-dul.ttl -> >>> https://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/dul/ >> >> Done >> >>> - SOSA-O&M: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/rdf/sosa-om-mapping.ttl -> >>> https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/om >>> - http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/rdf/sosa-oboe-mapping.ttl -> >>> https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/oboe >>> - http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/rdf/sosa-prov-mapping.ttl -> >>> https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa-prov >> >> I have also done these but there's a problem that I can't figure out and >> have asked our webmaster for help. If you navigate to the actual files >> (which for weird W3C reasons are called Overview.ttl, not index.ttl) >> you'll see them. But knock off the filename and you get a 403. No idea >> why - hence the call for help, but it's the kind of thing our webmaster >> (Denis) will have fixed in a trice. >> >> >> >>> >>> Document >>> >> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/integrated/proposed-server-specification.md >>> proposes >>> some functional specifications for serving them on the W3C server. All >> the >>> subtleties proposed in this document would make these ontologies >> published >>> in conformance with the best practices, and more. >> >> Hmmm... no, sorry. We don't do 303s from the namespace to the TR doc. >> They're different resources, not just different serialisations of omne >> resource. >> >> The /ns space doc is the ontology definition file, nothing else. The /TR >> doc is the Technical Report that includes all the front matter, >> explanations, diagrams, references etc. If you want an HTML doc at the >> namespace, OK, that's good, but it should just be the definitions. But >> you can get away with something much simpler, see >> https://www.w3.org/ns/oa, https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat etc. >> >> I'll let you know when the 403s are fixed. >> >> Do you think it's worth generating RDF/XML serialisations of the TTL >> files? Not a big job but it's not one I've done so far. >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil >> >>> >>> Best, >>> Maxime >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> Data Strategist, W3C >> http://www.w3.org/ >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 <+44%207887%20767755> >> @philarcher1 >> > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 21 April 2017 09:55:35 UTC