Re: Ontologies ready to be published on the W3C server

Hi Phil,

thank you, that's already excellent, sosa, ssn,ssn-dul, ssnx, are loaded
properly (at least) by Protégé and vowl.

about the 303 redirection to the index.html, my understanding was that 303
can mean "I redirect you to another resource that describes what you're
looking for".
I won't fight about this, it's already great the aforementioned files are
available at their URLs.

I just pushed the .rdf versions of sosa, ssn, ssnx, ssn-dul, in the same
folder. Sorry for not having generated them before.

Best,
Maxime


Le jeu. 20 avr. 2017 à 22:30, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> a écrit :

> Hi Maxime, pls see inline below.
>
> On 18/04/2017 15:28, Maxime Lefrançois wrote:
> > Dear Phil, all,
> >
> > The ontologies developed by the SSN subgroup are ready to be published on
> > the W3C for wide review. They are:
> >
> > - SOSA: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/sosa.ttl ->
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/
>
> Done
>
> > - SOSA: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/ssn.ttl ->
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/
>
> Done
>
> > - SSNX: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/ssnx.ttl ->
> > https://www.w3.org/2017/01/ssn-ssnx/
>
> Done, with the ttl file and a generated .owl file served through conneg.
>
>
> > - SSN-DUL: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/integrated/ssn-dul.ttl ->
> > https://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/dul/
>
> Done
>
> > - SOSA-O&M: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/rdf/sosa-om-mapping.ttl ->
> > https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/om
> > - http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/rdf/sosa-oboe-mapping.ttl ->
> > https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/oboe
> > - http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/rdf/sosa-prov-mapping.ttl ->
> > https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa-prov
>
> I have also done these but there's a problem that I can't figure out and
> have asked our webmaster for help. If you navigate to the actual files
> (which for weird W3C reasons are called Overview.ttl, not index.ttl)
> you'll see them. But knock off the filename and you get a 403. No idea
> why - hence the call for help, but it's the kind of thing our webmaster
> (Denis) will have fixed in a trice.
>
>
>
> >
> > Document
> >
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/integrated/proposed-server-specification.md
> > proposes
> > some functional specifications for serving them on the W3C server. All
> the
> > subtleties proposed in this document would make these ontologies
> published
> > in conformance with the best practices, and more.
>
> Hmmm... no, sorry. We don't do 303s from the namespace to the TR doc.
> They're different resources, not just different serialisations of omne
> resource.
>
> The /ns space doc is the ontology definition file, nothing else. The /TR
> doc is the Technical Report that includes all the front matter,
> explanations, diagrams, references etc. If you want an HTML doc at the
> namespace, OK, that's good, but it should just be the definitions. But
> you can get away with something much simpler, see
> https://www.w3.org/ns/oa, https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat etc.
>
> I'll let you know when the 403s are fixed.
>
> Do you think it's worth generating RDF/XML serialisations of the TTL
> files? Not a big job but it's not one I've done so far.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil
>
> >
> > Best,
> > Maxime
> >
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> Data Strategist, W3C
> http://www.w3.org/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755 <+44%207887%20767755>
> @philarcher1
>