Re: Agenda+ for this week's plenary: state of play in SSN

I just wanted to support Armin's email and statements.
Krzysztof


On 04/05/2017 07:40 AM, Armin Haller wrote:
> Can I just point out that the disagreement is only on a naming issue (whereby as far as I can tell, everyone can live with the names as they are implemented now). Otherwise there has no disagreement been recorded over the last couple of weeks and we are working through the remaining issues swiftly!
>
> On 5/4/17, 10:33 pm, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>
>      Ed,
>      
>      Given the large amount and content of e-mail seen since last night's SSN
>      meeting, with your permission, I'd like to add an item to the agenda for
>      today's plenary around the state of play with that deliverable. It seems
>      clear to me that there is still significant disagreement within the WG
>      about a number of fundamental issues and that therefore we must come to
>      a decision about its future. This within the broader context of the WG's
>      other deliverables and imminent charter expiry.
>      
>      Thanks
>      
>      Phil
>      
>      --
>      
>      
>      Phil Archer
>      Data Strategist, W3C
>      http://www.w3.org/
>      
>      http://philarcher.org
>      +44 (0)7887 767755
>      @philarcher1
>      
>      
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net

Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2017 19:07:57 UTC