- From: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:40:44 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "Ed Parsons" <eparsons@google.com>
Can I just point out that the disagreement is only on a naming issue (whereby as far as I can tell, everyone can live with the names as they are implemented now). Otherwise there has no disagreement been recorded over the last couple of weeks and we are working through the remaining issues swiftly!
On 5/4/17, 10:33 pm, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org> wrote:
Ed,
Given the large amount and content of e-mail seen since last night's SSN
meeting, with your permission, I'd like to add an item to the agenda for
today's plenary around the state of play with that deliverable. It seems
clear to me that there is still significant disagreement within the WG
about a number of fundamental issues and that therefore we must come to
a decision about its future. This within the broader context of the WG's
other deliverables and imminent charter expiry.
Thanks
Phil
--
Phil Archer
Data Strategist, W3C
http://www.w3.org/
http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2017 14:41:28 UTC