- From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 17:48:50 +0200
- To: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@apple.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Hi Jarno: The problem is independent of whether you have a **page** for the base model, you simply need to define it as an **entity**. You could e.g. use invisible markup for the base model and visible markup for the actually exposed model on a page and consolidate the multiple redundant entities for the base model using sameAs, e.g. to a Freebase, Wikipedia or Wikidata ID. Martin ----------------------------------- martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp > On 03 May 2016, at 17:24, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote: > > Although the example Thomas mentions is a valid solution, one of the things I keep running into is what to do when a site doesn't have a productmodel page yet does contains pages for variances of a product. > > For example, a site doesn't offer any page for the 'iPhone 6s' model, yet does offer product pages for 'iPhone 6s gold 16 GB', 'iPhone 6s silver 64 GB', etc. > > How could one express such product variants are part of a product family without having a product model page?
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 15:49:22 UTC