- From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 17:52:25 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
> On 03 May 2016, at 17:43, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > > The way I have done it in the past is just treat a Product Family as a Brand https://schema.org/Brand > > "A brand is a name used by an organization or business person for labeling a product, product group, or similar." > > iPhone is all of these things, A Brand, A Product Group/Family, and A Licensed Trademark > > Thad > +ThadGuidry > Yes, that is also a perfectly valid approach for the product family. A brand is actually just a named container for tradeable objects that "somehow" belong together (they need not serve similar functionality - a pair of Hepp Research mountaineering gloves and a Hepp Research canoe might belong to the same brand, even if they are very different types of products). The good thing about schema:brand is that you can attach logos and URLs and text to the entity. Martin ----------------------------------- martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 15:52:56 UTC