Re: schema validator?

Hi,

We're using https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tools/eyeball-getting-started.html <https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tools/eyeball-getting-started.html> for validation.

Best regards, Alex

> On 06 Jan 2016, at 03:44, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I find http://linter.structured-data.org/ <http://linter.structured-data.org/> to be quite good. It applies the rules based on the canonical schema.org <http://schema.org/> vocabulary as expressed in the RDFa at http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html <http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html> (unlike, say, Google's Structured Data Testing Tool which is implemented based on some internal rules at Google that differ from canonical schema.org <http://schema.org/>).
> 
> Like almost any RDFa / microdata extraction tool, the Structured Data Linter can run into some issues with malformed HTML and the like, but it's the best of the bunch that I've used. And it's open source & fairly easy to set up to run an instance on your own server if you don't want to have to rely on an external service.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Pilsk, Suzanne <PilskS@si.edu <mailto:PilskS@si.edu>> wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> We are looking to validate some schema we put in a project and seem to only find beta validators that all give different messages – either errors (different ones) – or says it is fine.
> 
>  
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Suzanne
> 
>  
> 
> Suzanne C. Pilsk
> 
> Head, Metadata Department
> 
> v. 202-633-1646 <tel:202-633-1646>
> pilsks@si.edu <mailto:pilsks@si.edu>
>  
> 
> Digital Programs and Initiatives Division
> 
> Smithsonian Libraries | http://library.si.edu <http://library.si.edu/>
> 10th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW
> 
> MRC 154, NH-37G
> 
> Washington, D.C.
> 
> 20013-7012
> 
> <image001.png>
> 
>  
> 
>