Re: schema validator?

A really handy tool is this browser extension - The OpenLink Structured
Data Sniffer:
  http://osds.openlinksw.com/


Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw

On 6 January 2016 at 14:33, Alexander Willner <alex@willner.ws> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We're using
> https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tools/eyeball-getting-started.html for
> validation.
>
> Best regards, Alex
>
> On 06 Jan 2016, at 03:44, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I find http://linter.structured-data.org/ to be quite good. It applies
> the rules based on the canonical schema.org vocabulary as expressed in
> the RDFa at http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html (unlike, say,
> Google's Structured Data Testing Tool which is implemented based on some
> internal rules at Google that differ from canonical schema.org).
>
> Like almost any RDFa / microdata extraction tool, the Structured Data
> Linter can run into some issues with malformed HTML and the like, but it's
> the best of the bunch that I've used. And it's open source & fairly easy to
> set up to run an instance on your own server if you don't want to have to
> rely on an external service.
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Pilsk, Suzanne <PilskS@si.edu> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> We are looking to validate some schema we put in a project and seem to
>> only find beta validators that all give different messages – either errors
>> (different ones) – or says it is fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Suzanne
>>
>>
>>
>> Suzanne C. Pilsk
>>
>> Head, Metadata Department
>>
>> v. 202-633-1646
>>
>> pilsks@si.edu
>>
>>
>>
>> Digital Programs and Initiatives Division
>>
>> Smithsonian Libraries | http://library.si.edu
>>
>> 10th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW
>>
>> MRC 154, NH-37G
>>
>> Washington, D.C.
>>
>> 20013-7012
>>
>> <image001.png>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>