W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:04:00 -0400
To: edbark@nist.gov, public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org
Message-Id: <20050822160410.659F34EECD@homer.w3.org>


Ooops, I meant to also include the link, just to be clear the draft is
itself public:

    http://www.w3.org/2005/07/rules/charter
     
(Jos did give the link on Saturday [1].)

   -- sandro


> > I think Dieter's comments may need to be taken very seriously.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > But I have not seen Draft 1.6, nor have my NIST colleagues who are 
> > extensively involved in W3C Semantic Web work.  Can someone tell me what 
> > list we should also be on that would have allowed us to see the Draft 
> > announcement?
> > 
> > Is there also a "private-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org"?
> 
> No, the announcement went to the W3C advisory committee, in this
> e-mail (which is member-only):
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2005JulSep/0019
> 
> There's a bit of a public/private balancing act here.  Discussions
> about whether the W3C should engage in a particular activity make
> sense in the W3C Advisory Committee.  (People affiliated with members
> should work through their AC Rep, if they want to participate in those
> discussions.)  Other discussions, like ones where we're trying to
> understand the options, are best done in public (eg on this list).
> 
>       -- sandro
> 

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rule-workshop-discuss/2005Aug/0004.html
Received on Monday, 22 August 2005 16:09:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:23 GMT