Re: Minutes + Actions 12.06.2015

thanks Peter.
Unfortunately I am all over the place these weeks and traveling the next two weeks as well but I will try and catch up with the wikipage.
I will synch with Josi in the next few weeks to create the wiki section on CEP (as promised) and synchronize the updated use cases. 
Cheers,
a.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Alessandra Mileo
Senior Research Fellow & Adjunct Lecturer
PI and WP Leader - http://www.ict-citypulse.eu
INSIGHT Research Center
NUI Galway, Ireland
Email: alessandra.mileo@insight-centre.org
Web: http://www.insight-centre.org/users/alessandra-mileo
-----------------------------------------------------------





On 15/giu/2015, at 10:36, Wetz Peter <peter.wetz@tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> thanks for the productive telco last Friday. The current activity on the mailling list leads me to the conclusion, that there are already/still some issues under discussion. Please get involved, so we will end up with a high quality data model :)
>  
> I created a wikipage showing the minutes of the telco plus all actions, so everyone who wants to catch up can do so:https://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/Telecon_12.06.2015
>  
> We also defined a lot of ACTIONS to do until the next call. I took the liberty and assigned some of them to participants who seemed most reasonable for fulfilling them.
>  
> This is an overview of the actions:
> ACTION: JPC to state on the Github-Page of our definitions that our model works for point in time semantics, but that it's possible to extend our model to time interval semantics.
> ACTION: PW to create a first draft of the vocabulary on Github and start discussion.
> ACTION: RK to add a simple example to see how multiple timestamps will be handled.
> ACTION: JPC to add "If two graphs in the stream have the same timestamp, then they must have different predicates." to our definitions.
> ACTION: JPC to add to our definition of a stream that a stream is ordered based on t and a given p.
> ACTION: JPC to do: when we define "bounded substreams" we add a sentence stating that this is a similar concept to "window" from CQL.
> ACTION: MDT to ammend the definitions of bounded substreams on github.
> ACTION: all to discuss proposal of MDT.
> ACTION: JXP to update requirements and use cases of SCEP via a separate wikipage.
> ACTION: AL to create a wikipage containing the table frome the slides.
> ACTION: JPC to get a link to the Serialization work of the Web of Things WG fro.m Sebastian.
>  
> Looking forward to the next call.
>  
> Best,
> Peter